Indian (Asian) vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,895,438 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $47,041, a difference of 14.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $104,993, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($56,253 compared to $50,343, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.29%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $66,306, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,369, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (65.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).