New Zealander vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,930,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 148.3 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $47,041, a difference of 7.5%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $104,993, a difference of 0.090%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $94,990, a difference of 0.16%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $111,051, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.8%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.0%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.4%).