Central American vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,263,428 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($91,087 compared to $112,859, a difference of 23.9%), median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $59,351, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $104,993, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $54,369, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $42,133, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.0%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.4%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.4%), no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%).