Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,250,183 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $66,306, a difference of 44.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,836 compared to $111,051, a difference of 40.9%), and median family income ($81,233 compared to $112,859, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $54,369, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($36,857 compared to $42,133, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($41,554 compared to $50,343, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 122.0%), married-couple family poverty (8.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 78.2%), and family poverty (14.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.0%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and single male poverty (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.1%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 63.1%), births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and married-couple households (37.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 246.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 126.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 106.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 32.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 76.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 106.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 80.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.3%), and no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (50.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.8%).