Potawatomi vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Laotians

Fair
Good
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,137,224 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Laotians.
Potawatomi Integration in Laotian Communities

Potawatomi vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $111,051, a difference of 31.2%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $94,990, a difference of 30.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $104,993, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $54,369, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $42,133, a difference of 21.3%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Income
Income MetricPotawatomiLaotian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Poor
26.4%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiLaotian
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiLaotian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Good
82.9%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 27.3%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiLaotian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
28.5%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.22%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Potawatomi vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 45.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%).
Potawatomi vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiLaotian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%