Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Educational Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Radley 66.7% 10.5% (+56.1)#1 9.3% (+57.4)#80
2. Athol 60.0% 10.5% (+49.5)#2 9.3% (+50.7)#115
3. Big Bow 54.5% 10.5% (+44.0)#3 9.3% (+45.2)#165
4. Woodruff 50.0% 10.5% (+39.5)#4 9.3% (+40.7)#218
5. Langdon 45.0% 10.5% (+34.5)#5 9.3% (+35.7)#288
6. Gaylord 40.0% 10.5% (+29.5)#6 9.3% (+30.7)#391
7. South Mound 39.3% 10.5% (+28.8)#7 9.3% (+30.0)#410
8. Croweburg 38.4% 10.5% (+27.8)#8 9.3% (+29.1)#438
9. Galesburg 38.1% 10.5% (+27.6)#9 9.3% (+28.8)#443
10. Elk Falls 35.9% 10.5% (+25.4)#10 9.3% (+26.6)#521
11. Manter 35.7% 10.5% (+25.2)#11 9.3% (+26.4)#526
12. Mildred 33.3% 10.5% (+22.8)#12 9.3% (+24.0)#653
13. Damar 32.9% 10.5% (+22.4)#13 9.3% (+23.6)#666
14. Kismet 32.9% 10.5% (+22.3)#14 9.3% (+23.5)#668
15. Galatia 30.8% 10.5% (+20.2)#15 9.3% (+21.5)#779
16. Wabaunsee 30.4% 10.5% (+19.9)#16 9.3% (+21.1)#801
17. Natoma 30.3% 10.5% (+19.8)#17 9.3% (+21.0)#805
18. Munjor 30.2% 10.5% (+19.7)#18 9.3% (+20.9)#814
19. Wright 29.4% 10.5% (+18.9)#19 9.3% (+20.1)#860
20. Thayer 29.2% 10.5% (+18.7)#20 9.3% (+19.9)#872
21. Milton 28.6% 10.5% (+18.0)#21 9.3% (+19.3)#920
22. Morrill 28.4% 10.5% (+17.9)#22 9.3% (+19.1)#936
23. Hillsboro 28.1% 10.5% (+17.6)#23 9.3% (+18.8)#960
24. Haddam 27.8% 10.5% (+17.3)#24 9.3% (+18.5)#994
25. Turon 27.7% 10.5% (+17.2)#25 9.3% (+18.4)#999
26. Lehigh 27.6% 10.5% (+17.0)#26 9.3% (+18.2)#1,008
27. Allen 27.3% 10.5% (+16.8)#27 9.3% (+18.0)#1,026
28. Highland 27.2% 10.5% (+16.7)#28 9.3% (+17.9)#1,041
29. La Harpe 26.9% 10.5% (+16.4)#29 9.3% (+17.6)#1,066
30. Neodesha 26.7% 10.5% (+16.2)#30 9.3% (+17.4)#1,080
31. Lindsborg 26.6% 10.5% (+16.0)#31 9.3% (+17.3)#1,091
32. North Newton 26.2% 10.5% (+15.6)#32 9.3% (+16.9)#1,129
33. Manhattan 25.8% 10.5% (+15.3)#33 9.3% (+16.5)#1,163
34. Levant 25.8% 10.5% (+15.3)#34 9.3% (+16.5)#1,166
35. Olsburg 25.5% 10.5% (+14.9)#35 9.3% (+16.2)#1,202
36. Fowler 25.2% 10.5% (+14.7)#36 9.3% (+15.9)#1,222
37. Chetopa 25.1% 10.5% (+14.6)#37 9.3% (+15.8)#1,233
38. Vining 25.0% 10.5% (+14.5)#38 9.3% (+15.7)#1,249
39. Susank 25.0% 10.5% (+14.5)#39 9.3% (+15.7)#1,254
40. Lafontaine 25.0% 10.5% (+14.5)#40 9.3% (+15.7)#1,255
41. Baldwin City 24.8% 10.5% (+14.3)#41 9.3% (+15.5)#1,271
42. Green 24.6% 10.5% (+14.0)#42 9.3% (+15.2)#1,298
43. Franklin 24.3% 10.5% (+13.8)#43 9.3% (+15.0)#1,332
44. Talmage 24.1% 10.5% (+13.6)#44 9.3% (+14.8)#1,353
45. Randall 23.8% 10.5% (+13.3)#45 9.3% (+14.5)#1,392
46. Culver 23.8% 10.5% (+13.3)#46 9.3% (+14.5)#1,395
47. Burdick 23.8% 10.5% (+13.3)#47 9.3% (+14.5)#1,399
48. Howard 23.7% 10.5% (+13.2)#48 9.3% (+14.4)#1,409
49. Hudson 23.6% 10.5% (+13.1)#49 9.3% (+14.3)#1,431
50. Cherokee 23.2% 10.5% (+12.7)#50 9.3% (+13.9)#1,491
51. Sterling 23.1% 10.5% (+12.5)#51 9.3% (+13.8)#1,523
52. Bendena 22.8% 10.5% (+12.3)#52 9.3% (+13.5)#1,551
53. Eastborough 22.7% 10.5% (+12.2)#53 9.3% (+13.4)#1,576
54. Moline 22.6% 10.5% (+12.1)#54 9.3% (+13.3)#1,589
55. Claflin 22.5% 10.5% (+12.0)#55 9.3% (+13.2)#1,616
56. Wheaton 22.4% 10.5% (+11.9)#56 9.3% (+13.1)#1,623
57. Haviland 22.0% 10.5% (+11.5)#57 9.3% (+12.7)#1,684
58. Frankfort 21.8% 10.5% (+11.3)#58 9.3% (+12.5)#1,720
59. St George 21.8% 10.5% (+11.3)#59 9.3% (+12.5)#1,724
60. Riley 21.8% 10.5% (+11.2)#60 9.3% (+12.5)#1,731
61. Smolan 21.5% 10.5% (+11.0)#61 9.3% (+12.2)#1,769
62. Stafford 21.4% 10.5% (+10.9)#62 9.3% (+12.1)#1,799
63. Alma 21.3% 10.5% (+10.8)#63 9.3% (+12.0)#1,813
64. Longton 21.1% 10.5% (+10.5)#64 9.3% (+11.7)#1,867
65. Peck 20.9% 10.5% (+10.4)#65 9.3% (+11.6)#1,909
66. Stuttgart 20.8% 10.5% (+10.3)#66 9.3% (+11.5)#1,928
67. Dwight 20.7% 10.5% (+10.2)#67 9.3% (+11.4)#1,950
68. Williamstown 20.6% 10.5% (+10.1)#68 9.3% (+11.3)#1,980
69. Weskan 20.5% 10.5% (+9.99)#69 9.3% (+11.2)#2,001
70. El Dorado 20.5% 10.5% (+9.98)#70 9.3% (+11.2)#2,004
71. Luray 20.5% 10.5% (+9.96)#71 9.3% (+11.2)#2,006
72. Albert 20.4% 10.5% (+9.88)#72 9.3% (+11.1)#2,028
73. Elbing 20.1% 10.5% (+9.62)#73 9.3% (+10.8)#2,078
74. Easton 19.7% 10.5% (+9.21)#74 9.3% (+10.4)#2,196
75. Atchison 19.7% 10.5% (+9.14)#75 9.3% (+10.4)#2,215
76. Hepler 19.6% 10.5% (+9.04)#76 9.3% (+10.2)#2,243
77. Blue Mound 19.5% 10.5% (+8.99)#77 9.3% (+10.2)#2,256
78. Hardtner 19.4% 10.5% (+8.92)#78 9.3% (+10.1)#2,268
79. Grinnell 19.4% 10.5% (+8.90)#79 9.3% (+10.1)#2,274
80. Bucklin 19.3% 10.5% (+8.81)#80 9.3% (+10.0)#2,299
81. Maize 19.3% 10.5% (+8.80)#81 9.3% (+10.0)#2,302
82. Randolph 19.2% 10.5% (+8.67)#82 9.3% (+9.88)#2,339
83. Wilsey 19.0% 10.5% (+8.52)#83 9.3% (+9.73)#2,375
84. Hunter 19.0% 10.5% (+8.52)#84 9.3% (+9.73)#2,377
85. Furley 19.0% 10.5% (+8.52)#85 9.3% (+9.73)#2,381
86. Mcconnell Afb 19.0% 10.5% (+8.43)#86 9.3% (+9.64)#2,400
87. Cassoday 18.9% 10.5% (+8.36)#87 9.3% (+9.57)#2,419
88. Cullison 18.8% 10.5% (+8.22)#88 9.3% (+9.43)#2,477
89. Severance 18.8% 10.5% (+8.22)#89 9.3% (+9.43)#2,479
90. Silver Lake 18.3% 10.5% (+7.73)#90 9.3% (+8.94)#2,663
91. Everest 18.1% 10.5% (+7.59)#91 9.3% (+8.80)#2,712
92. Burns 18.0% 10.5% (+7.51)#92 9.3% (+8.72)#2,739
93. Ingalls 18.0% 10.5% (+7.46)#93 9.3% (+8.67)#2,755
94. Hesston 18.0% 10.5% (+7.44)#94 9.3% (+8.65)#2,761
95. Sharon 17.9% 10.5% (+7.38)#95 9.3% (+8.60)#2,787
96. Lebo 17.9% 10.5% (+7.35)#96 9.3% (+8.56)#2,796
97. Winchester 17.8% 10.5% (+7.26)#97 9.3% (+8.48)#2,822
98. Conway Springs 17.7% 10.5% (+7.15)#98 9.3% (+8.36)#2,867
99. Lawrence 17.7% 10.5% (+7.13)#99 9.3% (+8.34)#2,874
100. Mound City 17.6% 10.5% (+7.07)#100 9.3% (+8.28)#2,912

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas are:
#1
60.0%
#2
45.0%
#3
40.0%
#4
38.1%
#5
35.9%
#6
35.7%
#7
33.3%
#8
32.9%
#9
32.9%
#10
30.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas?
Athol has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas with 60.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the State of Kansas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Kansas is 10.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States is 9.3%.