Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska

25.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hickman 1.4% 22.5% (-21.1)#1 24.1% (-22.6)#41
2. Wakefield 3.0% 22.5% (-19.5)#2 24.1% (-21.0)#239
3. Hooper 3.0% 22.5% (-19.5)#3 24.1% (-21.0)#241
4. Schuyler 3.2% 22.5% (-19.3)#4 24.1% (-20.9)#277
5. Big Springs 3.3% 22.5% (-19.2)#5 24.1% (-20.7)#298
6. Tilden 3.7% 22.5% (-18.8)#6 24.1% (-20.4)#380
7. Cairo 3.8% 22.5% (-18.7)#7 24.1% (-20.2)#414
8. Waverly 3.9% 22.5% (-18.6)#8 24.1% (-20.2)#431
9. Pierce 4.0% 22.5% (-18.5)#9 24.1% (-20.1)#450
10. Stanton 5.6% 22.5% (-16.9)#10 24.1% (-18.4)#887
11. Sutherland 5.9% 22.5% (-16.6)#11 24.1% (-18.2)#961
12. Plattsmouth 5.9% 22.5% (-16.6)#12 24.1% (-18.2)#987
13. Bennington 6.0% 22.5% (-16.5)#13 24.1% (-18.1)#1,011
14. Red Cloud 6.5% 22.5% (-16.0)#14 24.1% (-17.6)#1,170
15. Plymouth 6.7% 22.5% (-15.8)#15 24.1% (-17.4)#1,240
16. La Vista 6.9% 22.5% (-15.6)#16 24.1% (-17.2)#1,306
17. St Edward 7.4% 22.5% (-15.1)#17 24.1% (-16.7)#1,473
18. Cozad 7.6% 22.5% (-14.9)#18 24.1% (-16.5)#1,544
19. Hartington 7.7% 22.5% (-14.8)#19 24.1% (-16.4)#1,566
20. Staplehurst 8.3% 22.5% (-14.2)#20 24.1% (-15.7)#1,835
21. Oconto 8.3% 22.5% (-14.2)#21 24.1% (-15.7)#1,845
22. Wisner 8.6% 22.5% (-13.9)#22 24.1% (-15.5)#1,898
23. Mitchell 8.7% 22.5% (-13.8)#23 24.1% (-15.4)#1,934
24. Gothenburg 9.6% 22.5% (-12.9)#24 24.1% (-14.5)#2,273
25. Pender 9.7% 22.5% (-12.8)#25 24.1% (-14.4)#2,303
26. Randolph 9.7% 22.5% (-12.8)#26 24.1% (-14.4)#2,307
27. Papillion 9.7% 22.5% (-12.8)#27 24.1% (-14.3)#2,328
28. Fort Calhoun 10.0% 22.5% (-12.5)#28 24.1% (-14.1)#2,428
29. Franklin 10.0% 22.5% (-12.5)#29 24.1% (-14.1)#2,438
30. Snyder 10.0% 22.5% (-12.5)#30 24.1% (-14.1)#2,452
31. Juniata 10.2% 22.5% (-12.3)#31 24.1% (-13.9)#2,513
32. Offutt Afb 10.5% 22.5% (-12.0)#32 24.1% (-13.6)#2,608
33. Johnson 10.5% 22.5% (-12.0)#33 24.1% (-13.6)#2,657
34. Arnold 10.6% 22.5% (-11.9)#34 24.1% (-13.4)#2,705
35. Fairbury 10.8% 22.5% (-11.7)#35 24.1% (-13.2)#2,776
36. Neligh 11.1% 22.5% (-11.4)#36 24.1% (-13.0)#2,866
37. Clay Center 11.1% 22.5% (-11.4)#37 24.1% (-13.0)#2,880
38. Duncan 11.1% 22.5% (-11.4)#38 24.1% (-13.0)#2,883
39. Palisade 11.1% 22.5% (-11.4)#39 24.1% (-13.0)#2,899
40. Spencer 11.1% 22.5% (-11.4)#40 24.1% (-13.0)#2,901
41. Paxton 11.8% 22.5% (-10.7)#41 24.1% (-12.3)#3,138
42. Brainard 13.3% 22.5% (-9.17)#42 24.1% (-10.7)#3,785
43. Sidney 13.6% 22.5% (-8.94)#43 24.1% (-10.5)#3,862
44. Niobrara 13.6% 22.5% (-8.87)#44 24.1% (-10.4)#3,904
45. Valley 14.3% 22.5% (-8.22)#45 24.1% (-9.79)#4,107
46. Panama 14.3% 22.5% (-8.22)#46 24.1% (-9.79)#4,185
47. South Sioux City 14.7% 22.5% (-7.81)#47 24.1% (-9.38)#4,332
48. Walthill 15.2% 22.5% (-7.29)#48 24.1% (-8.86)#4,528
49. Rushville 15.4% 22.5% (-7.12)#49 24.1% (-8.69)#4,598
50. Inman 15.4% 22.5% (-7.12)#50 24.1% (-8.69)#4,638
51. Seward 15.4% 22.5% (-7.09)#51 24.1% (-8.66)#4,644
52. Doniphan 16.2% 22.5% (-6.29)#52 24.1% (-7.86)#4,948
53. Mccool Junction 16.7% 22.5% (-5.84)#53 24.1% (-7.41)#5,126
54. Orleans 16.7% 22.5% (-5.84)#54 24.1% (-7.41)#5,150
55. Lodgepole 16.7% 22.5% (-5.84)#55 24.1% (-7.41)#5,177
56. Avoca 16.7% 22.5% (-5.84)#56 24.1% (-7.41)#5,195
57. Martinsburg 16.7% 22.5% (-5.84)#57 24.1% (-7.41)#5,211
58. Utica 17.1% 22.5% (-5.36)#58 24.1% (-6.93)#5,366
59. Albion 17.4% 22.5% (-5.12)#59 24.1% (-6.69)#5,452
60. Shelton 17.4% 22.5% (-5.12)#60 24.1% (-6.69)#5,453
61. Elba 17.4% 22.5% (-5.12)#61 24.1% (-6.69)#5,469
62. Beaver City 17.6% 22.5% (-4.86)#62 24.1% (-6.43)#5,578
63. Dakota City 18.0% 22.5% (-4.53)#63 24.1% (-6.10)#5,711
64. Elm Creek 18.0% 22.5% (-4.51)#64 24.1% (-6.08)#5,714
65. Bayard 18.2% 22.5% (-4.33)#65 24.1% (-5.89)#5,774
66. Bennet 18.2% 22.5% (-4.33)#66 24.1% (-5.89)#5,779
67. Milligan 18.2% 22.5% (-4.33)#67 24.1% (-5.89)#5,825
68. Bee 18.2% 22.5% (-4.33)#68 24.1% (-5.89)#5,828
69. Ansley 18.6% 22.5% (-3.90)#69 24.1% (-5.47)#5,967
70. Milford 18.8% 22.5% (-3.76)#70 24.1% (-5.33)#6,021
71. Geneva 18.8% 22.5% (-3.76)#71 24.1% (-5.33)#6,023
72. Columbus 18.9% 22.5% (-3.65)#72 24.1% (-5.22)#6,085
73. Wayne 19.0% 22.5% (-3.50)#73 24.1% (-5.07)#6,141
74. Ainsworth 19.2% 22.5% (-3.28)#74 24.1% (-4.85)#6,222
75. Bellevue 19.7% 22.5% (-2.81)#75 24.1% (-4.38)#6,417
76. Gretna 19.7% 22.5% (-2.79)#76 24.1% (-4.36)#6,425
77. Ravenna 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#77 24.1% (-4.08)#6,512
78. Howells 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#78 24.1% (-4.08)#6,544
79. Inglewood 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#79 24.1% (-4.08)#6,557
80. Long Pine 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#80 24.1% (-4.08)#6,606
81. Bladen 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#82 24.1% (-4.08)#6,634
82. Holstein 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#83 24.1% (-4.08)#6,635
83. Stamford 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#84 24.1% (-4.08)#6,636
84. Brownville 20.0% 22.5% (-2.51)#85 24.1% (-4.08)#6,651
85. Alliance 20.2% 22.5% (-2.31)#86 24.1% (-3.88)#6,704
86. Ralston 20.2% 22.5% (-2.29)#87 24.1% (-3.86)#6,715
87. Weeping Water 20.4% 22.5% (-2.10)#88 24.1% (-3.67)#6,769
88. Crete 20.7% 22.5% (-1.77)#89 24.1% (-3.34)#6,877
89. Oshkosh 20.8% 22.5% (-1.75)#90 24.1% (-3.32)#6,884
90. Lincoln 20.8% 22.5% (-1.69)#91 24.1% (-3.26)#6,907
91. Kenesaw 20.8% 22.5% (-1.67)#92 24.1% (-3.24)#6,917
92. Trenton 20.8% 22.5% (-1.67)#93 24.1% (-3.24)#6,920
93. Greenwood 21.1% 22.5% (-1.45)#94 24.1% (-3.02)#7,008
94. Omaha 21.2% 22.5% (-1.30)#95 24.1% (-2.87)#7,051
95. Edgar 21.4% 22.5% (-1.08)#96 24.1% (-2.65)#7,144
96. Chadron 21.6% 22.5% (-0.938)#97 24.1% (-2.51)#7,198
97. Woodland Park 22.0% 22.5% (-0.556)#98 24.1% (-2.13)#7,343
98. Norfolk 22.0% 22.5% (-0.535)#99 24.1% (-2.10)#7,359
99. Riverdale 22.2% 22.5% (-0.285)#100 24.1% (-1.85)#7,497
100. Garland 22.2% 22.5% (-0.285)#101 24.1% (-1.85)#7,503

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska are:
#1
1.4%
#2
3.0%
#3
3.0%
#4
3.2%
#5
3.3%
#6
3.7%
#7
3.8%
#8
3.9%
#9
4.0%
#10
5.6%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska?
Hickman has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska with 1.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska is 22.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.