Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota

60.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Portland 3.6% 23.4% (-19.8)#1 24.1% (-20.5)#359
2. Cavalier 3.9% 23.4% (-19.5)#2 24.1% (-20.1)#437
3. Drayton 4.0% 23.4% (-19.4)#3 24.1% (-20.1)#453
4. Northwood 5.6% 23.4% (-17.8)#4 24.1% (-18.5)#860
5. Hatton 6.4% 23.4% (-17.0)#5 24.1% (-17.7)#1,135
6. Washburn 7.1% 23.4% (-16.3)#6 24.1% (-16.9)#1,364
7. New Salem 8.3% 23.4% (-15.1)#7 24.1% (-15.7)#1,805
8. New England 8.3% 23.4% (-15.1)#8 24.1% (-15.7)#1,807
9. Walcott 8.3% 23.4% (-15.1)#9 24.1% (-15.7)#1,834
10. West Fargo 8.8% 23.4% (-14.6)#10 24.1% (-15.3)#1,975
11. Ray 9.2% 23.4% (-14.2)#11 24.1% (-14.8)#2,145
12. Surrey 9.8% 23.4% (-13.6)#12 24.1% (-14.2)#2,367
13. Burlington 11.1% 23.4% (-12.3)#13 24.1% (-13.0)#2,872
14. Fessenden 11.1% 23.4% (-12.3)#14 24.1% (-13.0)#2,886
15. Taylor 11.1% 23.4% (-12.3)#15 24.1% (-13.0)#2,918
16. Horace 12.0% 23.4% (-11.4)#16 24.1% (-12.1)#3,210
17. Mapleton 12.5% 23.4% (-10.9)#17 24.1% (-11.6)#3,397
18. Grafton 13.6% 23.4% (-9.80)#18 24.1% (-10.5)#3,879
19. Wilton 14.3% 23.4% (-9.12)#19 24.1% (-9.79)#4,141
20. Dickinson 14.7% 23.4% (-8.68)#20 24.1% (-9.36)#4,350
21. Kulm 15.0% 23.4% (-8.40)#21 24.1% (-9.08)#4,462
22. Steele 15.4% 23.4% (-8.02)#22 24.1% (-8.69)#4,604
23. Minot 15.6% 23.4% (-7.80)#23 24.1% (-8.48)#4,704
24. Linton 16.7% 23.4% (-6.74)#24 24.1% (-7.41)#5,112
25. Medina 16.7% 23.4% (-6.74)#25 24.1% (-7.41)#5,176
26. Dunseith 18.0% 23.4% (-5.42)#26 24.1% (-6.09)#5,712
27. Mcville 18.2% 23.4% (-5.22)#27 24.1% (-5.89)#5,815
28. Mandan 18.4% 23.4% (-4.97)#28 24.1% (-5.65)#5,899
29. Larimore 18.8% 23.4% (-4.65)#29 24.1% (-5.33)#6,027
30. Kindred 18.8% 23.4% (-4.65)#30 24.1% (-5.33)#6,033
31. Fort Yates 18.8% 23.4% (-4.65)#31 24.1% (-5.33)#6,056
32. Crosby 20.0% 23.4% (-3.40)#32 24.1% (-4.08)#6,524
33. Trenton 20.0% 23.4% (-3.40)#33 24.1% (-4.08)#6,560
34. Williston 20.9% 23.4% (-2.50)#34 24.1% (-3.17)#6,937
35. Belcourt 20.9% 23.4% (-2.47)#35 24.1% (-3.15)#6,952
36. Plaza 21.4% 23.4% (-1.97)#36 24.1% (-2.65)#7,155
37. Lisbon 21.9% 23.4% (-1.48)#37 24.1% (-2.16)#7,323
38. Bismarck 22.0% 23.4% (-1.38)#38 24.1% (-2.05)#7,372
39. Oakes 23.2% 23.4% (-0.245)#39 24.1% (-0.919)#7,904
40. Mandaree 23.3% 23.4% (-0.069)#40 24.1% (-0.743)#7,975
41. Cando 24.4% 23.4% (+0.988)#41 24.1% (+0.314)#8,367
42. Grand Forks 24.5% 23.4% (+1.15)#42 24.1% (+0.473)#8,424
43. Lamoure 25.0% 23.4% (+1.60)#43 24.1% (+0.924)#8,606
44. Reynolds 25.0% 23.4% (+1.60)#44 24.1% (+0.924)#8,651
45. Green Acres 25.6% 23.4% (+2.15)#45 24.1% (+1.48)#8,874
46. Park River 25.7% 23.4% (+2.27)#46 24.1% (+1.60)#8,921
47. Belfield 25.7% 23.4% (+2.31)#47 24.1% (+1.64)#8,939
48. Rolla 25.8% 23.4% (+2.44)#48 24.1% (+1.77)#8,978
49. Turtle Lake 26.1% 23.4% (+2.68)#49 24.1% (+2.01)#9,077
50. Emerado 26.3% 23.4% (+2.91)#50 24.1% (+2.24)#9,149
51. Dunn Center 27.3% 23.4% (+3.87)#51 24.1% (+3.20)#9,510
52. Fargo 27.3% 23.4% (+3.94)#52 24.1% (+3.27)#9,537
53. Valley City 28.6% 23.4% (+5.17)#53 24.1% (+4.49)#9,913
54. Minto 28.6% 23.4% (+5.17)#54 24.1% (+4.49)#9,960
55. Shell Valley 29.5% 23.4% (+6.09)#55 24.1% (+5.42)#10,297
56. Watford City 30.3% 23.4% (+6.94)#56 24.1% (+6.27)#10,601
57. Fairmount 30.4% 23.4% (+7.03)#57 24.1% (+6.36)#10,638
58. Mayville 30.5% 23.4% (+7.09)#58 24.1% (+6.41)#10,652
59. Jamestown 30.5% 23.4% (+7.12)#59 24.1% (+6.44)#10,661
60. Gwinner 30.8% 23.4% (+7.37)#60 24.1% (+6.69)#10,745
61. Mohall 30.8% 23.4% (+7.37)#61 24.1% (+6.69)#10,750
62. New Town 30.9% 23.4% (+7.46)#62 24.1% (+6.79)#10,799
63. Enderlin 31.7% 23.4% (+8.30)#63 24.1% (+7.63)#11,046
64. Parshall 31.9% 23.4% (+8.48)#64 24.1% (+7.81)#11,091
65. Wahpeton 33.2% 23.4% (+9.75)#65 24.1% (+9.08)#11,457
66. Grenora 33.3% 23.4% (+9.93)#66 24.1% (+9.26)#11,642
67. Granville 33.3% 23.4% (+9.93)#67 24.1% (+9.26)#11,666
68. Adams 33.3% 23.4% (+9.93)#68 24.1% (+9.26)#11,749
69. Crary 33.3% 23.4% (+9.93)#69 24.1% (+9.26)#11,752
70. Esmond 33.3% 23.4% (+9.93)#70 24.1% (+9.26)#11,755
71. Wyndmere 36.2% 23.4% (+12.8)#71 24.1% (+12.1)#12,537
72. Lincoln 36.7% 23.4% (+13.3)#72 24.1% (+12.7)#12,680
73. Bottineau 37.1% 23.4% (+13.7)#73 24.1% (+13.1)#12,791
74. Solen 37.5% 23.4% (+14.1)#74 24.1% (+13.4)#12,945
75. Grand Forks Afb 38.5% 23.4% (+15.1)#75 24.1% (+14.4)#13,156
76. Selfridge 38.5% 23.4% (+15.1)#76 24.1% (+14.4)#13,199
77. Napoleon 40.0% 23.4% (+16.6)#77 24.1% (+15.9)#13,542
78. Wimbledon 40.0% 23.4% (+16.6)#78 24.1% (+15.9)#13,635
79. Zeeland 40.0% 23.4% (+16.6)#79 24.1% (+15.9)#13,648
80. Garrison 41.7% 23.4% (+18.3)#80 24.1% (+17.6)#13,992
81. Powers Lake 42.9% 23.4% (+19.5)#81 24.1% (+18.8)#14,333
82. Devils Lake 44.4% 23.4% (+21.0)#82 24.1% (+20.4)#14,612
83. Scranton 44.4% 23.4% (+21.0)#83 24.1% (+20.4)#14,653
84. Harvey 44.8% 23.4% (+21.4)#84 24.1% (+20.8)#14,723
85. Hankinson 44.8% 23.4% (+21.4)#85 24.1% (+20.8)#14,730
86. Carrington 44.9% 23.4% (+21.5)#86 24.1% (+20.9)#14,746
87. Minot Afb 45.5% 23.4% (+22.1)#87 24.1% (+21.4)#14,828
88. Wishek 45.5% 23.4% (+22.1)#88 24.1% (+21.4)#14,839
89. Pembina 45.5% 23.4% (+22.1)#89 24.1% (+21.4)#14,848
90. Ashley 47.4% 23.4% (+24.0)#90 24.1% (+23.3)#15,177
91. Tioga 48.9% 23.4% (+25.5)#91 24.1% (+24.9)#15,453
92. Bowman 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#92 24.1% (+25.9)#15,556
93. Fort Totten 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#93 24.1% (+25.9)#15,581
94. Drake 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#94 24.1% (+25.9)#15,718
95. Hoople 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#95 24.1% (+25.9)#15,752
96. Sheyenne 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#96 24.1% (+25.9)#15,764
97. Wing 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#97 24.1% (+25.9)#15,766
98. Crystal 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#98 24.1% (+25.9)#15,856
99. Hannaford 50.0% 23.4% (+26.6)#99 24.1% (+25.9)#15,860
100. Beach 51.9% 23.4% (+28.4)#100 24.1% (+27.8)#16,079

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota are:
#1
3.6%
#2
3.9%
#3
4.0%
#4
5.6%
#5
6.4%
#6
7.1%
#7
8.3%
#8
8.3%
#9
8.3%
#10
8.8%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota?
Portland has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota with 3.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota is 23.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.