Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa

49.0%
11.5%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74132 11.5% 29.8% (-18.4)#37 24.1% (-12.6)#4,202
2. 74120 12.2% 29.8% (-17.6)#42 24.1% (-11.9)#4,636
3. 74114 13.7% 29.8% (-16.1)#59 24.1% (-10.3)#5,545
4. 74119 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#64 24.1% (-9.79)#5,819
5. 74137 14.8% 29.8% (-15.1)#72 24.1% (-9.30)#6,130
6. 74133 18.9% 29.8% (-11.0)#106 24.1% (-5.21)#8,561
7. 74134 20.5% 29.8% (-9.31)#130 24.1% (-3.54)#9,518
8. 74104 23.4% 29.8% (-6.45)#153 24.1% (-0.683)#11,116
9. 74145 24.6% 29.8% (-5.26)#167 24.1% (+0.508)#11,751
10. 74112 24.9% 29.8% (-4.94)#169 24.1% (+0.828)#11,900
11. 74135 26.7% 29.8% (-3.17)#189 24.1% (+2.60)#12,940
12. 74116 29.5% 29.8% (-0.382)#229 24.1% (+5.39)#14,354
13. 74136 32.7% 29.8% (+2.82)#271 24.1% (+8.59)#15,739
14. 74128 32.7% 29.8% (+2.87)#273 24.1% (+8.64)#15,762
15. 74105 35.9% 29.8% (+6.07)#315 24.1% (+11.8)#17,066
16. 74115 36.6% 29.8% (+6.71)#325 24.1% (+12.5)#17,279
17. 74130 36.8% 29.8% (+6.92)#330 24.1% (+12.7)#17,346
18. 74107 37.4% 29.8% (+7.51)#341 24.1% (+13.3)#17,537
19. 74126 38.5% 29.8% (+8.61)#353 24.1% (+14.4)#17,882
20. 74127 38.8% 29.8% (+8.94)#358 24.1% (+14.7)#17,991
21. 74146 38.9% 29.8% (+9.07)#360 24.1% (+14.8)#18,031
22. 74108 39.4% 29.8% (+9.55)#366 24.1% (+15.3)#18,173
23. 74129 40.0% 29.8% (+10.1)#372 24.1% (+15.9)#18,313
24. 74106 41.7% 29.8% (+11.9)#384 24.1% (+17.6)#18,885
25. 74131 43.8% 29.8% (+13.9)#412 24.1% (+19.7)#19,383
26. 74110 49.0% 29.8% (+19.1)#450 24.1% (+24.9)#20,464

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
11.5%
#2
12.2%
#3
13.7%
#4
14.3%
#5
14.8%
#6
18.9%
#7
20.5%
#8
23.4%
#9
24.6%
#10
24.9%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK with 11.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa is 32.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma is 29.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.