Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi

City Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1. Symonds 100.0% 6.0% (+94.0)#1 4.5% (+95.5)#93
2. Bovina 78.3% 6.0% (+72.3)#2 4.5% (+73.8)#136
3. Mayersville 75.0% 6.0% (+69.0)#3 4.5% (+70.5)#148
4. Eden 42.9% 6.0% (+36.9)#4 4.5% (+38.4)#538
5. Wade 41.8% 6.0% (+35.8)#5 4.5% (+37.4)#574
6. Beaumont 40.2% 6.0% (+34.2)#6 4.5% (+35.7)#613
7. Morgan City 40.0% 6.0% (+34.0)#7 4.5% (+35.5)#621
8. Bude 39.4% 6.0% (+33.4)#8 4.5% (+34.9)#656
9. Agricola 35.0% 6.0% (+29.0)#9 4.5% (+30.6)#802
10. Cruger 33.3% 6.0% (+27.3)#10 4.5% (+28.9)#875
11. Sledge 30.8% 6.0% (+24.8)#11 4.5% (+26.3)#992
12. Sylvarena 30.0% 6.0% (+24.0)#12 4.5% (+25.5)#1,032
13. Saucier 29.6% 6.0% (+23.6)#13 4.5% (+25.2)#1,054
14. Henderson Point 29.6% 6.0% (+23.6)#14 4.5% (+25.2)#1,056
15. Hickory 29.4% 6.0% (+23.4)#15 4.5% (+24.9)#1,062
16. Houston 29.2% 6.0% (+23.2)#16 4.5% (+24.7)#1,073
17. De Soto 28.2% 6.0% (+22.2)#17 4.5% (+23.7)#1,145
18. Goodman 27.0% 6.0% (+21.0)#18 4.5% (+22.6)#1,241
19. Arcola 26.3% 6.0% (+20.3)#19 4.5% (+21.9)#1,304
20. Paden 26.3% 6.0% (+20.3)#20 4.5% (+21.9)#1,310
21. Gattman 25.9% 6.0% (+19.9)#21 4.5% (+21.5)#1,341
22. Shaw 25.7% 6.0% (+19.7)#22 4.5% (+21.3)#1,355
23. Itta Bena 25.3% 6.0% (+19.3)#23 4.5% (+20.8)#1,388
24. Mound Bayou 25.2% 6.0% (+19.2)#24 4.5% (+20.7)#1,394
25. Sidon 25.0% 6.0% (+19.0)#25 4.5% (+20.5)#1,429
26. Lyman 24.7% 6.0% (+18.7)#26 4.5% (+20.2)#1,477
27. Redwater 23.6% 6.0% (+17.6)#27 4.5% (+19.2)#1,591
28. Coahoma 23.5% 6.0% (+17.5)#28 4.5% (+19.1)#1,606
29. Pearlington 23.4% 6.0% (+17.4)#29 4.5% (+18.9)#1,623
30. Shelby 23.3% 6.0% (+17.3)#30 4.5% (+18.8)#1,631
31. Mccool 23.1% 6.0% (+17.1)#31 4.5% (+18.6)#1,656
32. Eudora 23.0% 6.0% (+17.0)#32 4.5% (+18.6)#1,664
33. Brooksville 21.9% 6.0% (+15.9)#33 4.5% (+17.4)#1,810
34. Weir 21.8% 6.0% (+15.8)#34 4.5% (+17.3)#1,824
35. Elliott 21.7% 6.0% (+15.7)#35 4.5% (+17.2)#1,835
36. Pelahatchie 21.7% 6.0% (+15.7)#36 4.5% (+17.2)#1,836
37. Lumberton 21.2% 6.0% (+15.2)#37 4.5% (+16.8)#1,882
38. Silver Creek 20.8% 6.0% (+14.8)#38 4.5% (+16.4)#1,926
39. Columbia 20.0% 6.0% (+14.0)#39 4.5% (+15.6)#2,023
40. Crawford 19.8% 6.0% (+13.7)#40 4.5% (+15.3)#2,105
41. Collins 19.2% 6.0% (+13.2)#41 4.5% (+14.7)#2,184
42. Pearl River 18.3% 6.0% (+12.2)#42 4.5% (+13.8)#2,347
43. Winstonville 18.2% 6.0% (+12.2)#43 4.5% (+13.7)#2,369
44. Derma 18.1% 6.0% (+12.1)#44 4.5% (+13.6)#2,388
45. Drew 17.8% 6.0% (+11.8)#45 4.5% (+13.3)#2,456
46. Port Gibson 17.6% 6.0% (+11.6)#46 4.5% (+13.1)#2,494
47. Nellieburg 17.3% 6.0% (+11.3)#47 4.5% (+12.9)#2,546
48. Kilmichael 17.3% 6.0% (+11.3)#48 4.5% (+12.8)#2,557
49. Braxton 17.2% 6.0% (+11.2)#49 4.5% (+12.8)#2,566
50. Pickens 17.2% 6.0% (+11.2)#50 4.5% (+12.8)#2,570
51. Ethel 17.0% 6.0% (+11.0)#51 4.5% (+12.5)#2,620
52. Marion 16.6% 6.0% (+10.6)#52 4.5% (+12.1)#2,716
53. Prentiss 16.0% 6.0% (+9.96)#53 4.5% (+11.5)#2,853
54. Falkner 15.9% 6.0% (+9.90)#54 4.5% (+11.4)#2,865
55. Yazoo City 15.6% 6.0% (+9.63)#55 4.5% (+11.2)#2,931
56. Roxie 15.5% 6.0% (+9.51)#56 4.5% (+11.1)#2,966
57. Senatobia 15.4% 6.0% (+9.40)#57 4.5% (+10.9)#2,985
58. Jonestown 15.4% 6.0% (+9.38)#58 4.5% (+10.9)#2,994
59. Bassfield 15.2% 6.0% (+9.21)#59 4.5% (+10.8)#3,038
60. Byhalia 15.0% 6.0% (+8.98)#60 4.5% (+10.5)#3,092
61. Rosedale 14.9% 6.0% (+8.93)#61 4.5% (+10.5)#3,100
62. Bruce 14.9% 6.0% (+8.91)#62 4.5% (+10.5)#3,107
63. Mendenhall 14.8% 6.0% (+8.83)#63 4.5% (+10.4)#3,125
64. Charleston 14.6% 6.0% (+8.62)#64 4.5% (+10.2)#3,198
65. Osyka 14.5% 6.0% (+8.51)#65 4.5% (+10.1)#3,225
66. Lambert 14.4% 6.0% (+8.39)#66 4.5% (+9.93)#3,263
67. Benoit 13.8% 6.0% (+7.75)#67 4.5% (+9.29)#3,472
68. Hollandale 13.7% 6.0% (+7.74)#68 4.5% (+9.28)#3,474
69. Louisville 13.7% 6.0% (+7.69)#69 4.5% (+9.23)#3,488
70. Crowder 13.5% 6.0% (+7.48)#70 4.5% (+9.02)#3,569
71. Ashland 13.4% 6.0% (+7.43)#71 4.5% (+8.97)#3,585
72. Lexington 13.3% 6.0% (+7.33)#72 4.5% (+8.87)#3,609
73. Hazlehurst 13.2% 6.0% (+7.18)#73 4.5% (+8.72)#3,666
74. Oakland 13.2% 6.0% (+7.15)#74 4.5% (+8.70)#3,679
75. Randolph 13.1% 6.0% (+7.10)#75 4.5% (+8.64)#3,707
76. Waynesboro 13.1% 6.0% (+7.09)#76 4.5% (+8.63)#3,708
77. State Line 13.0% 6.0% (+7.04)#77 4.5% (+8.58)#3,725
78. Cleveland 13.0% 6.0% (+6.99)#78 4.5% (+8.53)#3,755
79. Glen 13.0% 6.0% (+6.98)#79 4.5% (+8.53)#3,760
80. Tchula 12.8% 6.0% (+6.84)#80 4.5% (+8.38)#3,811
81. Carthage 12.7% 6.0% (+6.68)#81 4.5% (+8.23)#3,857
82. Gulf Hills 12.6% 6.0% (+6.59)#82 4.5% (+8.13)#3,892
83. Shubuta 12.2% 6.0% (+6.24)#83 4.5% (+7.78)#4,055
84. Mccomb 12.1% 6.0% (+6.08)#84 4.5% (+7.63)#4,135
85. Philadelphia 12.1% 6.0% (+6.06)#85 4.5% (+7.60)#4,146
86. Tylertown 11.9% 6.0% (+5.89)#86 4.5% (+7.43)#4,219
87. Coldwater 11.8% 6.0% (+5.76)#87 4.5% (+7.30)#4,274
88. Hamilton 11.6% 6.0% (+5.62)#88 4.5% (+7.17)#4,351
89. Hillsboro 11.5% 6.0% (+5.53)#89 4.5% (+7.08)#4,382
90. Ellisville 11.5% 6.0% (+5.51)#90 4.5% (+7.05)#4,399
91. Jumpertown 11.4% 6.0% (+5.42)#91 4.5% (+6.97)#4,432
92. Metcalfe 11.3% 6.0% (+5.30)#92 4.5% (+6.84)#4,488
93. Summit 11.3% 6.0% (+5.25)#93 4.5% (+6.79)#4,510
94. Myrtle 11.1% 6.0% (+5.11)#94 4.5% (+6.65)#4,561
95. Crosby 11.1% 6.0% (+5.11)#95 4.5% (+6.65)#4,585
96. Picayune 11.0% 6.0% (+5.00)#96 4.5% (+6.54)#4,645
97. Georgetown 10.8% 6.0% (+4.81)#97 4.5% (+6.35)#4,755
98. New Houlka 10.7% 6.0% (+4.66)#98 4.5% (+6.20)#4,837
99. Beauregard 10.4% 6.0% (+4.44)#99 4.5% (+5.99)#4,973
100. D Lo 10.4% 6.0% (+4.41)#100 4.5% (+5.95)#5,004

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi are:
#1
75.0%
#2
42.9%
#3
41.8%
#4
40.2%
#5
40.0%
#6
39.4%
#7
33.3%
#8
30.8%
#9
30.0%
#10
29.6%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi?
Mayersville has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi with 75.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Mississippi is 6.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.