Pennsylvania German vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,478,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 62.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $45,764, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $55,677, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,615 compared to $42,651, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $91,926, a difference of 0.18%), and median household income ($75,814 compared to $75,240, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.4%), female poverty (13.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.69%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.94%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.6%).