Immigrants vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,621,707 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $45,764, a difference of 16.3%), median household income ($85,818 compared to $75,240, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $88,390, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $55,677, a difference of 7.1%), median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $50,292, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 30.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.40%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and poverty (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.2%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.8%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%).