Iroquois vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,200,422 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 234.2 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $55,677, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $45,764, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,430 compared to $42,651, a difference of 0.52%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $84,461, a difference of 0.93%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,034, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.1%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.64%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.97%), female disability (14.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%).