German vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,807,500 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Germans corresponds to an increase of 12.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,224 compared to $88,390, a difference of 13.4%), median family income ($102,254 compared to $91,926, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,804 compared to $45,764, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,986 compared to $36,034, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,730 compared to $55,677, a difference of 7.3%), and median earnings ($45,935 compared to $42,651, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.9%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.5%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and married-couple households (49.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.5%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.2%).