Thai vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,756,571 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($110,648 compared to $75,240, a difference of 47.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $88,390, a difference of 46.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $84,461, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.5%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $45,764, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $55,677, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 60.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 59.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 33.5%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (50.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 66.7%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 69.0%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.7%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.2%).