Icelander vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,181,694 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.343% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 343.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $88,390, a difference of 15.7%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $75,240, a difference of 14.0%), and per capita income ($44,987 compared to $39,568, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $36,034, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $42,651, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.2%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).