Austrian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,316,324 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.878. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.050% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 1,049.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $88,390, a difference of 23.0%), per capita income ($48,116 compared to $39,568, a difference of 21.6%), and median household income ($91,339 compared to $75,240, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $45,764, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $36,034, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.4%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.4%).