British vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,312,034 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.761. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.333% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 1,333.0 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $88,390, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($108,705 compared to $91,926, a difference of 18.2%), and median household income ($88,914 compared to $75,240, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $36,034, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $45,764, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.5%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%).