Immigrants from Asia vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,825,396 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $75,240, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $88,390, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $84,461, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $55,677, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $36,034, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 41.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.3%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.8%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 46.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.17%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 52.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%).