Kiowa vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,994,949 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 78.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $88,390, a difference of 18.1%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $75,240, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $36,034, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($39,232 compared to $42,651, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 28.0%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and family poverty (12.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 34.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (61.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.0%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.9%).