Guatemalan vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,190,136 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $45,764, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $50,292, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $88,390, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $36,034, a difference of 0.95%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $75,240, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and single female poverty (23.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.18, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 97.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%).