Taiwanese vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,471,121 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 148.2 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $84,461, a difference of 20.2%), median household income ($89,900 compared to $75,240, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $88,390, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $45,764, a difference of 8.8%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $50,292, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 51.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 47.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.1%).