Subsaharan African vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,925,212 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.6%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $45,764, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $50,292, a difference of 0.23%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $84,461, a difference of 0.27%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $39,568, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 20.2%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 4.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.33%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.1%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.8%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.3%).