Scandinavian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,471,269 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $88,390, a difference of 16.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $45,764, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($86,073 compared to $75,240, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $36,034, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $42,651, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%).