Navajo vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,083,367 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 65.4 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $39,568, a difference of 36.3%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $91,926, a difference of 29.5%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $75,240, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $45,764, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $36,034, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $42,651, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 117.7%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 93.4%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 81.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 91.1%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 82.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 60.6%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.67%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 39.9%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.73%), female disability (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.6%).