Chilean vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,800,858 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.436% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 435.9 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $88,390, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $75,240, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $84,461, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $36,034, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $50,292, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.8%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.1%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%).