Bhutanese vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,726,572 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $59,090, a difference of 22.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $98,660, a difference of 19.4%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $100,656, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $52,465, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $39,228, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.5%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.6%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.2%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.65%).