Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,650,574 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $93,631, a difference of 26.1%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $53,680, a difference of 24.6%), and median family income ($125,150 compared to $100,656, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $52,465, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $59,090, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.33%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.5%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.8%).