Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Uruguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Uruguayans
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Uruguayan Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,391,239 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 133.0 Uruguayans.
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $53,680, a difference of 9.9%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $44,318, a difference of 9.9%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $46,190, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $39,228, a difference of 0.77%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $100,656, a difference of 0.88%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $59,090, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Good $44,318 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Fair $100,656 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Average $84,691 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Average $46,190 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Fair $53,680 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Fair $39,228 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Good $52,465 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Fair $93,631 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Fair $98,660 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Poor $59,090 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 25.2% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.0%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father poverty (12.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Average 11.8% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 166.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 76.9%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Excellent 83.1% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Poor 45.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Poor 33.1% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.6%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Tsimshian vs Uruguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 97.8%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 69.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Uruguayan |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |