Scottish vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,639,769 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.256% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 256.0 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 15.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $59,090, a difference of 4.5%), and median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,440 compared to $44,318, a difference of 0.27%), median household income ($85,101 compared to $84,691, a difference of 0.48%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $46,190, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.95%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), currently married (49.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.050%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 66.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and college, under 1 year (67.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.61%), associate's degree (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%).