Icelander vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,853,676 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to a decrease of 71.5 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $59,090, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $98,660, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $39,228, a difference of 0.30%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $84,691, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($44,987 compared to $44,318, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.8%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%).