Immigrants from South Africa vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,951,581 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $53,680, a difference of 17.2%), per capita income ($51,465 compared to $44,318, a difference of 16.1%), and median family income ($116,286 compared to $100,656, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $52,465, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $39,228, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($51,850 compared to $46,190, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.27%), single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.63%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.81%).