Immigrants from South America vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,196,539 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to an increase of 16.2 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $52,465, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($85,611 compared to $84,691, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $59,090, a difference of 0.10%), median family income ($100,414 compared to $100,656, a difference of 0.24%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $93,631, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.37%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (65.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.19%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.41%).