Burmese vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,910,106 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $98,660, a difference of 23.1%), median family income ($123,369 compared to $100,656, a difference of 22.6%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $84,691, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $52,465, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,228, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.56%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.53%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.2%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.73%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%).