Nonimmigrants vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,592,696 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,669 compared to $44,318, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($79,429 compared to $84,691, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,170 compared to $53,680, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $59,090, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $98,660, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty (14.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 7.3%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 42.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and master's degree (13.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.2%).