Immigrants from Central America vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,111,281 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $44,318, a difference of 26.7%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $100,656, a difference of 18.3%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $53,680, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $52,465, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $59,090, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.98%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.4%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.6%).