Swedish vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,538,189 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 17.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $98,660, a difference of 7.8%), and median family income ($108,499 compared to $100,656, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $39,228, a difference of 0.49%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $52,465, a difference of 0.99%), and per capita income ($45,750 compared to $44,318, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.32%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 66.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%).