Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,803,995 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 30.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $98,660, a difference of 8.0%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $100,656, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $52,465, a difference of 0.050%), median earnings ($45,729 compared to $46,190, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $39,228, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.6%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.3%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.7%), married-couple households (41.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.46%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 118.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 15.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.17%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.0%).