Malaysian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,262,747 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 10.5 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $44,318, a difference of 13.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $93,631, a difference of 6.0%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $53,680, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $59,090, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $52,465, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.64%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty (14.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 46.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.4%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.50%), 4th grade (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 5th grade (96.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.0%).