Immigrants from Micronesia vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,264,339 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.277% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 276.9 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $44,318, a difference of 18.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $93,631, a difference of 16.3%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $53,680, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $59,090, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $52,465, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty (14.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.1%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.3%).