Ecuadorian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,749,582 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 13.6 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $59,090, a difference of 7.5%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $100,656, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,228, a difference of 0.28%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,190, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $93,631, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.5%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.38%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 101.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 13.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%).