Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi

50.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Fulton 4.9% 45.9% (-41.1)#1 33.1% (-28.3)#270
2. Brandon 6.3% 45.9% (-39.6)#2 33.1% (-26.8)#482
3. Lake 7.5% 45.9% (-38.4)#3 33.1% (-25.6)#691
4. Byram 7.5% 45.9% (-38.4)#4 33.1% (-25.6)#694
5. Tunica Resorts 7.7% 45.9% (-38.2)#5 33.1% (-25.4)#718
6. Marks 8.8% 45.9% (-37.1)#6 33.1% (-24.3)#943
7. Vancleave 10.0% 45.9% (-35.9)#7 33.1% (-23.1)#1,160
8. Mize 10.0% 45.9% (-35.9)#8 33.1% (-23.1)#1,194
9. Olive Branch 11.4% 45.9% (-34.5)#9 33.1% (-21.7)#1,499
10. Ocean Springs 11.6% 45.9% (-34.3)#10 33.1% (-21.5)#1,530
11. Robinhood 12.0% 45.9% (-33.9)#11 33.1% (-21.1)#1,626
12. Marion 12.3% 45.9% (-33.6)#12 33.1% (-20.8)#1,683
13. Tylertown 12.5% 45.9% (-33.4)#13 33.1% (-20.6)#1,722
14. Ridgeland 12.8% 45.9% (-33.2)#14 33.1% (-20.4)#1,812
15. State Line 13.0% 45.9% (-32.9)#15 33.1% (-20.1)#1,873
16. Myrtle 13.7% 45.9% (-32.2)#16 33.1% (-19.4)#2,027
17. Pelahatchie 13.8% 45.9% (-32.2)#17 33.1% (-19.4)#2,041
18. Schlater 14.3% 45.9% (-31.7)#18 33.1% (-18.8)#2,195
19. Noxapater 14.6% 45.9% (-31.3)#19 33.1% (-18.5)#2,271
20. Boyle 14.8% 45.9% (-31.2)#20 33.1% (-18.4)#2,292
21. New Hebron 14.8% 45.9% (-31.1)#21 33.1% (-18.3)#2,311
22. Lyon 15.0% 45.9% (-30.9)#22 33.1% (-18.1)#2,356
23. Pope 15.4% 45.9% (-30.6)#23 33.1% (-17.8)#2,434
24. Terry 15.8% 45.9% (-30.1)#24 33.1% (-17.3)#2,549
25. Duncan 16.7% 45.9% (-29.3)#25 33.1% (-16.5)#2,788
26. Standing Pine 17.7% 45.9% (-28.2)#26 33.1% (-15.4)#3,020
27. Rawls Springs 18.4% 45.9% (-27.5)#27 33.1% (-14.7)#3,215
28. Gluckstadt 18.6% 45.9% (-27.4)#28 33.1% (-14.6)#3,244
29. Columbia 19.4% 45.9% (-26.5)#29 33.1% (-13.7)#3,475
30. Edwards 19.5% 45.9% (-26.5)#30 33.1% (-13.7)#3,487
31. New Albany 19.5% 45.9% (-26.4)#31 33.1% (-13.6)#3,502
32. Hatley 20.0% 45.9% (-25.9)#32 33.1% (-13.1)#3,642
33. Clinton 20.9% 45.9% (-25.0)#33 33.1% (-12.2)#3,913
34. Dumas 22.2% 45.9% (-23.7)#34 33.1% (-10.9)#4,303
35. Kearney Park 22.4% 45.9% (-23.5)#35 33.1% (-10.7)#4,345
36. Long Beach 22.5% 45.9% (-23.5)#36 33.1% (-10.7)#4,350
37. Raleigh 22.7% 45.9% (-23.2)#37 33.1% (-10.4)#4,408
38. Pearl 23.7% 45.9% (-22.2)#38 33.1% (-9.39)#4,674
39. Algoma 25.0% 45.9% (-20.9)#39 33.1% (-8.14)#5,017
40. Cruger 25.0% 45.9% (-20.9)#40 33.1% (-8.14)#5,082
41. Woodland 25.0% 45.9% (-20.9)#41 33.1% (-8.14)#5,106
42. Escatawpa 27.3% 45.9% (-18.7)#42 33.1% (-5.86)#5,643
43. Heidelberg 27.3% 45.9% (-18.7)#43 33.1% (-5.86)#5,665
44. Nettleton 27.4% 45.9% (-18.5)#44 33.1% (-5.70)#5,722
45. Bolton 27.6% 45.9% (-18.4)#45 33.1% (-5.55)#5,760
46. Poplarville 27.6% 45.9% (-18.3)#46 33.1% (-5.52)#5,768
47. Richland 28.0% 45.9% (-18.0)#47 33.1% (-5.17)#5,870
48. Enterprise 28.0% 45.9% (-17.9)#48 33.1% (-5.14)#5,889
49. Maben 28.1% 45.9% (-17.9)#49 33.1% (-5.05)#5,908
50. Oxford 28.3% 45.9% (-17.6)#50 33.1% (-4.84)#5,966
51. Batesville 28.6% 45.9% (-17.4)#51 33.1% (-4.56)#6,018
52. Thaxton 29.4% 45.9% (-16.5)#52 33.1% (-3.72)#6,296
53. Magee 29.7% 45.9% (-16.3)#53 33.1% (-3.45)#6,367
54. Inverness 30.3% 45.9% (-15.6)#54 33.1% (-2.83)#6,567
55. Southaven 30.7% 45.9% (-15.3)#55 33.1% (-2.49)#6,645
56. Coffeeville 31.7% 45.9% (-14.2)#56 33.1% (-1.43)#6,919
57. Booneville 31.8% 45.9% (-14.2)#57 33.1% (-1.35)#6,939
58. Belmont 31.9% 45.9% (-14.1)#58 33.1% (-1.28)#6,968
59. Nicholson 32.0% 45.9% (-13.9)#59 33.1% (-1.14)#6,996
60. Hernando 32.9% 45.9% (-13.0)#60 33.1% (-0.229)#7,217
61. Mooreville 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#61 33.1% (+0.198)#7,310
62. Beaumont 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#62 33.1% (+0.198)#7,361
63. Meadville 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#63 33.1% (+0.198)#7,388
64. Ashland 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#64 33.1% (+0.198)#7,396
65. Sledge 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#65 33.1% (+0.198)#7,457
66. Mclain 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#66 33.1% (+0.198)#7,459
67. Sebastopol 33.3% 45.9% (-12.6)#67 33.1% (+0.198)#7,496
68. Rolling Fork 33.8% 45.9% (-12.2)#68 33.1% (+0.615)#7,645
69. Summit 34.6% 45.9% (-11.4)#69 33.1% (+1.44)#7,822
70. Pickens 35.6% 45.9% (-10.3)#70 33.1% (+2.51)#8,079
71. Tupelo 36.0% 45.9% (-9.94)#71 33.1% (+2.87)#8,185
72. Blue Mountain 36.4% 45.9% (-9.58)#72 33.1% (+3.23)#8,278
73. Gulf Hills 36.7% 45.9% (-9.21)#73 33.1% (+3.59)#8,401
74. Biloxi 37.0% 45.9% (-8.90)#74 33.1% (+3.91)#8,489
75. Farmington 37.1% 45.9% (-8.80)#75 33.1% (+4.01)#8,507
76. D Lo 37.5% 45.9% (-8.44)#76 33.1% (+4.36)#8,615
77. Hickory 37.5% 45.9% (-8.44)#77 33.1% (+4.36)#8,625
78. Polkville 38.1% 45.9% (-7.85)#78 33.1% (+4.96)#8,783
79. Horn Lake 38.3% 45.9% (-7.59)#79 33.1% (+5.21)#8,841
80. Petal 38.4% 45.9% (-7.55)#80 33.1% (+5.26)#8,850
81. Louin 38.5% 45.9% (-7.48)#81 33.1% (+5.33)#8,888
82. Crystal Springs 38.9% 45.9% (-7.05)#82 33.1% (+5.75)#8,973
83. Latimer 39.3% 45.9% (-6.60)#83 33.1% (+6.20)#9,104
84. Big Creek 40.0% 45.9% (-5.94)#84 33.1% (+6.86)#9,376
85. Waveland 40.1% 45.9% (-5.81)#85 33.1% (+7.00)#9,396
86. Madison 40.7% 45.9% (-5.28)#86 33.1% (+7.52)#9,502
87. Tunica 41.2% 45.9% (-4.76)#87 33.1% (+8.04)#9,609
88. Indianola 41.2% 45.9% (-4.73)#88 33.1% (+8.07)#9,623
89. Amory 41.4% 45.9% (-4.54)#89 33.1% (+8.26)#9,657
90. Greenwood 41.5% 45.9% (-4.43)#90 33.1% (+8.38)#9,676
91. Holly Springs 41.6% 45.9% (-4.36)#91 33.1% (+8.45)#9,685
92. De Kalb 41.7% 45.9% (-4.27)#92 33.1% (+8.53)#9,721
93. Centreville 41.7% 45.9% (-4.23)#93 33.1% (+8.58)#9,747
94. Metcalfe 42.0% 45.9% (-3.97)#94 33.1% (+8.84)#9,798
95. Coldwater 42.1% 45.9% (-3.84)#95 33.1% (+8.97)#9,827
96. Beulah 42.1% 45.9% (-3.84)#96 33.1% (+8.97)#9,837
97. Walnut Grove 42.9% 45.9% (-3.08)#97 33.1% (+9.72)#10,006
98. Blue Springs 42.9% 45.9% (-3.08)#98 33.1% (+9.72)#10,036
99. Beechwood 43.4% 45.9% (-2.57)#99 33.1% (+10.2)#10,129
100. Sumner 44.0% 45.9% (-1.94)#100 33.1% (+10.9)#10,273

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi are:
#1
4.9%
#2
6.3%
#3
7.5%
#4
7.5%
#5
7.7%
#6
8.8%
#7
10.0%
#8
10.0%
#9
11.4%
#10
11.6%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi?
Fulton has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi with 4.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi is 45.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.