Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa

80.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1.7413215.3%39.0%(-23.7)#3033.1%(-17.9)#3,404
2.7411915.5%39.0%(-23.5)#3233.1%(-17.6)#3,495
3.7412015.7%39.0%(-23.3)#3333.1%(-17.4)#3,552
4.7413425.1%39.0%(-13.9)#9633.1%(-8.07)#7,297
5.7411426.1%39.0%(-12.9)#10033.1%(-7.06)#7,629
6.7413328.0%39.0%(-11.0)#10833.1%(-5.16)#8,353
7.7413728.1%39.0%(-10.9)#11033.1%(-4.99)#8,434
8.7411630.1%39.0%(-8.94)#12733.1%(-3.07)#9,210
9.7410433.5%39.0%(-5.51)#15533.1%(+0.372)#10,703
10.7413535.2%39.0%(-3.83)#16733.1%(+2.05)#11,285
11.7411235.3%39.0%(-3.67)#16933.1%(+2.21)#11,360
12.7414536.0%39.0%(-3.01)#17733.1%(+2.87)#11,605
13.7412839.5%39.0%(+0.492)#21833.1%(+6.37)#12,897
14.7413642.4%39.0%(+3.42)#24633.1%(+9.29)#13,950
15.7410745.9%39.0%(+6.93)#27433.1%(+12.8)#15,002
16.7410547.4%39.0%(+8.40)#28733.1%(+14.3)#15,476
17.7412947.9%39.0%(+8.89)#29433.1%(+14.8)#15,612
18.7411547.9%39.0%(+8.93)#29533.1%(+14.8)#15,623
19.7413048.0%39.0%(+8.94)#29633.1%(+14.8)#15,629
20.7414648.6%39.0%(+9.61)#30233.1%(+15.5)#15,807
21.7410855.1%39.0%(+16.1)#36333.1%(+22.0)#17,459
22.7410655.7%39.0%(+16.7)#36733.1%(+22.6)#17,587
23.7412758.0%39.0%(+18.9)#38633.1%(+24.8)#18,045
24.7412658.4%39.0%(+19.4)#39133.1%(+25.2)#18,144
25.7411065.6%39.0%(+26.6)#43233.1%(+32.5)#19,250
26.7413167.7%39.0%(+28.7)#44533.1%(+34.6)#19,559

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
15.3%
#2
15.5%
#3
15.7%
#4
25.1%
#5
26.1%
#6
28.0%
#7
28.1%
#8
30.1%
#9
33.5%
#10
35.2%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK with 15.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa is 43.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma is 39.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.