Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa

5.1%
59.2%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74116 59.2% 17.2% (+42.0)#37 13.7% (+45.4)#1,818
2. 74119 55.0% 17.2% (+37.8)#44 13.7% (+41.3)#2,037
3. 74105 44.0% 17.2% (+26.8)#73 13.7% (+30.3)#2,779
4. 74126 33.1% 17.2% (+15.9)#117 13.7% (+19.4)#3,923
5. 74110 30.3% 17.2% (+13.2)#126 13.7% (+16.6)#4,271
6. 74106 29.7% 17.2% (+12.5)#129 13.7% (+16.0)#4,374
7. 74112 27.4% 17.2% (+10.2)#137 13.7% (+13.7)#4,737
8. 74136 27.2% 17.2% (+9.99)#141 13.7% (+13.4)#4,790
9. 74108 27.0% 17.2% (+9.79)#142 13.7% (+13.2)#4,819
10. 74107 23.0% 17.2% (+5.88)#169 13.7% (+9.33)#5,586
11. 74127 22.8% 17.2% (+5.62)#170 13.7% (+9.07)#5,633
12. 74115 18.9% 17.2% (+1.70)#194 13.7% (+5.15)#6,535
13. 74134 15.6% 17.2% (-1.55)#220 13.7% (+1.90)#7,393
14. 74130 14.6% 17.2% (-2.58)#229 13.7% (+0.871)#7,666
15. 74114 14.5% 17.2% (-2.68)#230 13.7% (+0.770)#7,695
16. 74129 14.4% 17.2% (-2.73)#231 13.7% (+0.721)#7,701
17. 74135 14.0% 17.2% (-3.21)#235 13.7% (+0.241)#7,852
18. 74145 11.0% 17.2% (-6.14)#254 13.7% (-2.68)#8,784
19. 74133 7.6% 17.2% (-9.56)#278 13.7% (-6.11)#10,055
20. 74104 5.2% 17.2% (-12.0)#299 13.7% (-8.50)#10,949
21. 74128 5.1% 17.2% (-12.1)#300 13.7% (-8.62)#10,983

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
59.2%
#2
55.0%
#3
44.0%
#4
33.1%
#5
30.3%
#6
29.7%
#7
27.4%
#8
27.2%
#9
27.0%
#10
23.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
74116 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK with 59.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa is 18.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma is 17.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.