Immigrants from Micronesia vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,487,958 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.100% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 99.7 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $99,429, a difference of 23.4%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $56,663, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $105,309, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,440, a difference of 0.72%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $54,436, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 19.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.8%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.0%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.8%).