Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,403,874 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 78.4 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $53,359, a difference of 42.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $112,228, a difference of 39.3%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $65,518, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $55,932, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $69,774, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.71%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 106.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 96.6%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 85.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.4%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.2%).