Immigrants from Micronesia vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,975,514 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $98,586, a difference of 22.4%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $45,804, a difference of 22.3%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $110,011, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $65,854, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 68.7%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 64.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%).