Immigrants from Micronesia vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,531,285 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $98,886, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $105,070, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $90,261, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $62,766, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $56,052, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.30, a difference of 0.65%), currently married (45.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 42.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%).