Immigrants from Micronesia vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,297,578 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 24.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $29,031, a difference of 29.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $47,722, a difference of 27.8%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $59,159, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $33,046, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($41,133 compared to $36,999, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 115.9%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 92.3%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 27.4%), single female poverty (23.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 37.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 46.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 85.7%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 76.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 56.6%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.7%), associate's degree (40.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 64.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.8%), female disability (13.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.0%).