Immigrants from Micronesia vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,881,845 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 13.7 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $49,152, a difference of 24.1%), median family income ($90,345 compared to $84,981, a difference of 6.3%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $50,655, a difference of 0.070%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $37,383, a difference of 0.22%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $81,483, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 26.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 19.8%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and family households (64.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.33%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.0%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.5%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.7%).